Left: District Map from 2010, Right: District Map post-de Blasio Diet on June 23, 2015 Image by Landmark West! |
This morning, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a
public meeting to consider designation of the third, and as they emphasize,
"final" segment of the Riverside-West End Avenue Historic
District. Originally calendared on
November 16, 2010, the District extension under review today showed the
slimming effects of The de Blasio Diet- weighing in at an original 377
buildings in 2011, today this "study area" was reduced to a trim 344 (a
number even Bob Harper and Jillian Michaels would be astonished at).
LPC staff Lisa Kersavage and MaryAnne Percival present the the slimmed-down RSD-WEA EXT II Historic District today. |
What exactly was excised? Predominantly, the Broadway
border- in its entirety, and various carve outs for playgrounds, tenements and
row houses-- block "fragments" which "did not sufficiently
contribute to the sense of place". A
scant few images displayed examples of the cut outs but by no means represented
all of the 33 missing sites- sites Commissioner Michael Devonshire
unsuccessfully lobbied for the Commission to visit prior to voting. In a concession, formerly omitted P.S. 75 was
drawn back into the map as of this morning, but one branded as a
"no-style" building which is a debased designation. Everyone cheats on a diet a little,
right?
In addition to Broadway, the revised boundaries were nipped
and tucked both north and south. The new
district was cut from 89th Street, to begin all the way up at 92nd Street and
similarly, it was shaved down a block to 108th Street as its modified northern
most border.
Members of the public, unable to testify held up maps of the original district boundaries to protest "Government in the Dark" |
The LPC defended their all inboard-of-Broadway diet restrictions by deferring
to legal counsel who cited previously designated Historic Districts
(Gansevoort, Ridgewood, East Village etc.) that had cut-outs identified at time
of designation. What makes this unique
is not only how a commission adamant about not adhering to precedent is suddenly
leaning on precedent when convenient (now) but the unprecedented scale of
reduction. This District is in fact, the
Biggest Loser to date!
Dissent among the commissioners logically questioned why
buildings by established pedigrees (Neville and Bagge; George and Edward Blum),
recognized elsewhere within the Community District were forsaken here. The
response was that Broadway would not contribute to the cohesion of the
district. Commissioner Fred Bland
lamented that it took 43 years to vote on this District which was clearly deserving
and he hoped "the notion of Broadway" would not take as long to
evaluate. Commissioners Adi Shamir
Baron, and John Gustafson also echoed the need to put attention towards better
understanding Broadway's identity, and to recognize its cultural landscape.
The reality is, with the buildings omitted, Broadway becomes
the excess skin for the developers to re-shape, and even the work of the best
plastic surgeon looks familiar but out of place.
The Commissioners in conversation with their legal and research staff |
That these decisions were made behind closed doors is unsettling-
that the final map was not made available to those experts voting on it until
the flash of a slide in a power-point is unconscionable. After a self
congratulatory victory lap, pronouncing the process and resultant district as
respectful, thoughtful, rigorous, fair and mindful of initial requests, Chair
Meenakshi Srinivasan called for a vote of designation. With the only alternative of denying
designation, the modified district passed unanimously, becoming the twelfth
Historic District within the Community Board.
Up next, lucky 13...
2 comments:
I was at the hearing yesterday and am seriously angry about what happened. I plan to write a letter to LPC chair Srinivasan, cc to Letitia James, Scott Stringer, all the commissioners, and Mayor de Blasio.
But I would like to know more about the legality of the maneuver. The LPC's counsel made a vague distinction between what was done ("consulting experts" is what I heard) and amending the proposal, which would have required a public hearing and public comment.
I don't see how this was not an amendment to the proposal, and I wonder if groups like LW! and HDC might be considering legal action.
Thanks,
Eve Sinaiko
Hi Eve, we share your concerns! We are indeed working with The West End Preservation Society, and the Historic Districts Council on further steps. The content and quantity of the sites carved out is unprecedented. Feel free to email us for further details.
Post a Comment